Rethinking Role Models: Modern Fatherhood, Women’s Leadership, and the Search for New Truths

Rethinking Role Models

What does it mean to lead in a world where old models are shifting? What happens when our definitions of strength, sacrifice, and success no longer match the roles we’ve inherited? And can the quiet evolution inside homes mirror the public revolutions in boardrooms and parliaments?

With fathers day wrapped up in the UK and USA, the timing coincides with a profound shift in the nation’s leadership landscape.

More women are holding political and corporate power than ever before, while more men are stepping into caregiving roles once labeled secondary. This dual transformation—of who leads and how we lead—presents a rich opportunity to reflect not just on progress, but on the deeper emotional and cultural currents beneath it.

And in the spirit of Joseph’s Letter, we’re not here to offer a singular conclusion. Like Michael Battersby’s search for meaning through the grief of losing his wife Margaret, we’re tracing a pattern: one where tradition meets transformation, and where legacy is something we both inherit and rewrite.

Shifting Leadership landscape

From Parliament to the Playroom: Shifting Leadership Landscapes

Australia’s 2025 political moment is historic. Women now comprise 49.1% of federal parliament, and for the first time, the Liberal Party is led by a woman, Sussan Ley. This isn’t tokenism—it’s structural change. On the corporate front, companies like Telstra, Coles, and Fortescue are placing women at the helm, with female CEOs now leading 25% of top firms.

What we’re witnessing is not just numerical representation. It’s a reframing of what leadership looks like. Research consistently shows that women outperform men in nearly every domain of effective leadership—transformational, ethical, collaborative, and outcome-driven. Yet, structural biases and pay disparities persist. Women continue to earn only 88 cents for every dollar earned by men, with that gap widening in executive roles.

But here’s where this mirrors Joseph’s Letter: the deeper tension is not simply between genders, but between old frameworks of authority and emerging models of value. Just as Cardinal O’Grady resists Michael Battersby’s pursuit of personal truth, many institutions today still cling to traditional hierarchies, fearful of what equitable change might disrupt.

Catholic Discipline and Authoritarian Conditioning

The educational environment of early 20th-century Austria was steeped in regimentation. Catholic schools, in particular, emphasized discipline over inquiry, hierarchy over dialogue. Scholars have noted that this style of religious instruction, focused on control and conformity, may have reinforced the authoritarian tendencies that later found expression in Nazi ideology.

While it’s a dangerous oversimplification to draw a straight line from Catholic schooling to fascism, it is critical to examine how formative experiences with power and obedience can shape a worldview.

Hitler’s immersion in a system that valued silence, order, and submission did not create his genocidal ideology—but it may have normalized the psychological conditions necessary for its rise: a longing for order, a fear of chaos, and an instinctive deference to hierarchy.

Fatherhood

Fatherhood Reimagined: The Rise of the Engaged Caregiver

Parallel to the rise of female leadership is the quiet, often under-recognized transformation of fatherhood. The number of stay-at-home dads in Australia has more than doubled in the past decade.

Single fathers represent the fastest-growing household demographic. Men are showing up in parenting classes, requesting flexible work arrangements, and learning to nurture in ways their own fathers often could not.

Yet, much like Michael’s children in Joseph’s Letter, who struggle to understand their father’s grief-driven mission, modern fathers are still contending with inherited scripts. Many describe themselves as “helpers” rather than equal partners.

Despite desiring balance, they face cultural and corporate resistance—workplaces still treat flexibility as a “mum’s issue,” and only 8% of organizations actively support men’s caregiving roles.

This shift calls into question not just who does what at home, but what it means to be a father in the first place. If fatherhood is no longer tethered to stoicism and breadwinning, then what becomes of masculinity when it opens itself to vulnerability, co-parenting, and emotional labor?

Leadership, Grief, and the Search for Legacy

The threads running through both modern fatherhood and rising female leadership are not just about parity. They are about legacy—about what we pass down, what we resist, and what we choose to rewrite.

In Joseph’s Letter, Michael’s journey is driven not just by the death of his wife, but by the need to make sense of it—to extract meaning from loss. His children represent diverging responses to change: one pragmatic, one dutiful, both unsure of their father’s relentless quest.

Likewise, today’s evolving roles of mothers and fathers, CEOs and ministers, reveal not just progress but emotional friction. There is grief in letting go of what was, even when it no longer serves.

But as Michael reminds us, transformation often begins in the act of questioning. Of not accepting what we’ve inherited without asking whether it still fits.

Toward a New Kind of Role Model

The question Australia now faces is not whether women can lead or men can parent—it’s whether our systems are prepared to reflect and support these realities. Companies with high gender diversity outperform their peers. Children with engaged fathers show stronger developmental outcomes.

Leaders who model empathy, patience, and adaptability succeed not in spite of those traits, but because of them.

Much like Joseph’s Letter blurs the line between personal and theological, between grief and faith, our current moment asks us to see leadership as something far more expansive than position or gender. It’s about the ability to endure doubt. To lead without needing dominance. To parent with presence, not performance.

Father’s Day 2025 doesn’t just celebrate men—it honors the evolving meaning of care, responsibility, and relational strength. It recognizes that leadership begins in the home and extends into the boardroom and beyond.

And it reflects a country that, like Michael Battersby, is slowly learning that the answers we need may not lie in tradition alone, but in the courage to follow our convictions—even when the institutions around us hesitate.

In Closing:

Just as Joseph’s Letter compels us to examine where belief ends and evidence begins, this cultural moment invites us to question which models of leadership we elevate, and why. We’re not replacing fathers or leaders—we’re reframing them. And in doing so, we might just uncover something closer to truth.

If you enjoy these types of blogs, you’ll love our free newsletter – subscribe today. 


References

  1. Workplace Gender Equality Agency (WGEA). (2025). Gender Pay Gap Data. Retrieved from: https://www.wgea.gov.au/pay-and-gender/gender-pay-gap-data
  2. Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2025). Gender Indicators. Retrieved from: https://www.wgea.gov.au/data-statistics/ABS-gender-pay-gap-data
  3. Chief Executive Women. (2025). 40:40:20 Leadership Targets. Retrieved from: https://mbs.edu/news/why-chief-executive-women-is-calling-for-40-40-20-targets
  4. Melbourne Business School. (2025). Women in Leadership Performance Study. Retrieved from: https://hrnews.co.uk/data-reveals-companies-with-female-ceos-are-more-profitable
  5. McKinsey & Company. (2025). Diversity Wins: How Inclusion Matters.
  6. FSU Business School. (2024). Study Reveals Women Excel in Leadership. Retrieved from: https://business.fsu.edu/article/study-reveals-women-excel-effective-aspects-leadership
  7. Equimundo. (2023). State of Australia’s Fathers Report. Retrieved from: https://www.equimundo.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/State-of-Australias-Fathers-report.pdf
  8. Australian Human Rights Commission. (2024). Flexible Work Practices and Fatherhood.
  9. SBS. (2025). Dads’ Revolution: Modern Fatherhood Advocacy. Retrieved from: https://www.sbs.com.au/news/podcast-episode/dads-revolution-pushing-for-reforms-to-embrace-modern-fatherhood/3iqge4j9o
  10. Pathways to Politics for Women. (2025). Women in Politics 2025 Report. Retrieved from: https://pathwaystopolitics.org.au/knowledge-hub/women-in-politics-2025
  11. ANU Gender Institute. (2025). Election Scorecard on Women’s Political Representation. Retrieved from: https://giwl.anu.edu.au/2025-election
  12. Robert Parsons. (2025). Joseph’s Letter: A Novel. (Refer to “Book brief: Joseph’s Letter” PDF)
  13. Australian Institute of Company Directors (AICD). (2024). Women on Boards and Executive Teams Report.
  14. Emerging Minds. (2025). Supporting Dads in Their Role as Fathers. Retrieved from: https://emergingminds.com.au/resources/podcast/supporting-dads-in-their-role-as-fathers/transcript

Published by Robert Parsons

Robert is an author and teacher.

Leave a comment